Thoughts, Freedom Watch and Random Notes from Ember

This blog attempts to give you a politically incorrect, independent, alternative and insightful view of the world, away from commercial broadsheets. I BELIEVE IN PEOPLE POWER. Please empower, encourage, inform, inspire me and this blog with your valuable feedback or donation.

On Internet Social Networking September 7, 2008

Brave New World of Digital Intimacy

The New York Times had this extensive article on Social Networking websites. I wrote the following comment as my rumination on the subject. Surprisingly, moderators rejected it( to the best of my knowledge). Wonder why? Was it misogynistic? Anti Religion? Too religious? Would you know why? Anyhow, I am glad I can still post it and let the world read.

This article almost gave me headaches. It reminds me of Internet’s trillions of tentacles. Get to this Wikipedia link for a list of popular social networking sites for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_networking_websites

You get Facebook, then Twitter and then something else. Then another new site pops up providing the best of three and then yet again something else. It’s a NEVER ending quest. I think the book of Ecclesiastes in Bible was written when some prophet foresaw the internet and digital age of today: ”All things are wearisome; more than one can express…there is nothing new under the sun.”

Once a friend asks you to come look at his or her page, soon you realize you MUST register to view the page and you end up getting signed up for all the Facebooks and Twitters spread all over the face of this once green and blue but now all digital earth. Even newspapers (like Washington Post) and book sellers (like Amazon) offer social networking to their registered users.

Sometimes, a pioneering Social Networker (for some reason, They are ALWAYS women) invites the flock to some new social networking site (It might be Shelfari or Multiply or HeavenknowsWhat) and then gets sick of it and abandons it anyway, only to proclaim that the next one she’s found is the perfect one.

It’s like some lady Moses of the digital age messing about her flock through the eternal silicon valley of utter wastefulness and constant flux. But in this story there is neither Jehovah nor Jesus to save us.

And these things can of course become very obsessive. You must know what new ”moods” or ”twitters” or other updates there are. Even news websites and news aggregators act like twitters and heart beats of the world that get updated every minute.

Recently, Atlantic Monthly came with an article ”Is Google making us stupid” (http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google) You bet it is. Reluctantly, I did an experiment to find out the truth. I actually switched off my computer (if I keep it on I must check all twitters and emails every 30 minutes)… so I switched it off (I was able to do it as I’d also gotten sick of the latest Spywares, Adwares etc. that afflicted my PC, by the way, my latest blog offers some good tips to fellow sufferers and surfers).

After having my digital contraption off… I was learning so much more in my spare time by simply being able to read books and sticking with the reading, newspaper articles, even just watching TV, listening to radio. And I relaxed a lot, enjoyed my coffee better… was able to productively and creatively think about many other things. Also, I was at peace.

You can do that too! Or else, Abandon hope all Ye who enter here….


 

What the F is going on in Georgia? August 28, 2008

Georgia has been in the news. Small countries or regions get into the news only when big countries get involved. So, Yo Ho Georgia, you got Lucky.

Russia is back on the world stage as the monster that the Western world’s politicians and novelists love it to be. This Red Russia Rising mentality might even resurrect the careers of international spy and thriller writers like  ummm.. Tom Clancy.

This blog’s views on the whole situation can be summed up in Rajiv’s views expressed on the online comments pages of The New York Times. He was writing in response to this typical whiny tone about Russia’s role in Georgia:Russia Blames the Victim”.

Rajiv’s comments to this article are as follow (Copy pasted from THIS LINK, Comment No. 30):

”Sorry, I’ve got to disagree with this opinion piece. ALL of Western media are blindly siding with Georgia and vilifying Russia. Even a local newspaper in New Zealand has published a random letter (New Zealanders are not well known for their interest in global politics and are better known for their neutrality and blissful ignorance) from someone expressing his outrage (surely generated by Western media coverage of this conflict) at Russian aggression against Georgia. Needless to say it made me laugh both because of its naiveness and ignorance.


Even generally left wing and objective BBC is strongly prejudiced against Russia.

In this conflict Russians are no saints but they have certainly been given too many reasons in the last 20 years or so to go mad like this. After the break up of Soviet Union the West has treated Russia with nothing but contempt and mockery. Even as this was not enough, United States and NATO have been- unnecessarily- pursuing the policy of military adventurism against already beleaguered Russia: from surrounding Russia with NATO allies to installing missile defense shields around its border.

Russia is the only country in the world that speaks out on strong discrimination against Russian ethnic minorities in the new countries that emerged after the break up of Soviet Union. The West grossly underestimated Russian nationalism and sense of pride. Russia was written off as a stinking and ailing third world country that only had nuclear bombs, weapons and military to speak of.

But last decade has taken Western world by surprise. Russia has been resurgent because of two factors: it’s Petroleum and Natural gas wealth and its ambitious nationalism. For better or worse Europe and the West will always have to deal with this huge country that has global strategic interests because of its history, geography and very strong national identity.

Russia has seen Western contempt and Western military ganging up against it in the last 10 years or so. Russia has also been snubbed when it tried to speak for its Slavic neighbors in Eastern Europe. Kosovo was made into a free country without much regard for Russian objections. Now, Western intervention and encroachment seems (from Russian point of view) to be targeted at Russia itself. Can you blame this proud nation for acting mad when tiny Georgia in its backyard taunts Russia because it thinks it is buds with Western Europe, UK and USA?

Abkhazia and South Ossetia have wanted independence for long like Kosovo. Citizens in these two regions have faced aggression and human rights violations by Georgian police and military. Russian military action was imminent and has been in the making for a long time.

Georgia itself remains a corrupt country and away from its capital Tbilisi Georgians live in dilapidated conditions. Rather than playing these stupid and dangerous geopolitical games Georgia must pursue peace and reconciliation with its own neighbors. Georgia should also stop bullying South Ossetia/Abkhazia regions and respect their autonomy.”

— Rajiv, New Zealand

 

Suicide Terrorism 101 February 26, 2008

***May edit later for clarity and fix typos, typing it off and publishing it instantly for now**

**All comments are welcome and please feel free to share with others***

 

I am running short on time to update this blog often. But I will definitely continue to update this blog especially when I feel compelled to by some flaming concerns or ideas. And this one was inspired by an article ”Genesis of Suicide Terrorism” by Scott Atran published in an excellent collection of essays called ”The best American Science and Nature Writing” edited by Steven Pinker. I certainly have some ideas about this terror about terrorism that is heard about everywhere from Presidential/ Prime Ministerial or Congressional/ Parliamentary speeches to mass media outlets, internet webpages, books etc.

 

 

I jotted down these points in a hurry last night after reading the article. The purpose of this post is not to write an article high on statistics but to offer some insights based on common sense.

 

 

I am trying to focus on crucial issues that maybe considered irrelevant, trivial or abstract by foreign policy institutes and academics who are more interested in explaining away things through reason and statistics. Indeed most people in Middle East and even in West are not looking for psychoanalysis, politics or statistics as they behave in much simpler and subtler ways. They neither read nor are interested in reading press releases and statements by the US State Department, thesis or papers by academics, books by specialists or journalists.

 

 

I hope this post will help anyone reading it to understand the issue or at least reflect on it. Please note that the terrorism that I mention is that of Islamic extremism.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why Suicide Terrorism exists?

 

 

1.) Poverty and religious/ideological Extremism– The article by Scott Atran undermines poverty as the major cause of suicide terrorism. I strongly disagree. Poverty produces suicide terrorism on many levels: poor or nonexistent education that results in dogmatism, unemployment because of shattered economy, frustration, desperation, bitterness, disturbed family life; all these factors in turn make young individuals very vulnerable to religious fundamentalism, fatalism, charismatic fundamentalist spiritual leaders.

 

 

 

Ideological extremism is created in part because of poverty as mentioned above but it also exists on its own. As Scott Atran mentions that many of the suicide bombers have been fairly educated young men with respectable jobs. Culture and religion play powerful roles. I’m sure academic degrees do not represent education. If it did Islamic society won’t be riddled with messed up theocratic governments, women won’t face inhuman restrictions and even bigger threats of domestic violence and honor killings. I think Bushites and American conservatives got it right when they talk about opening up of the markets and liberalizing economies.

 

 

 

In the absence of healthy interaction with the West and Islamic countries extremism spreads and pervades all sections of society. But unfortunately Bushites and Conservatives also don’t give a damn about sincerely liberalizing or educating Islamic societies as they seem to be more interested in money$$$$$$ as the pattern of American trade and diplomatic links with countries like Saudi Arabia shows.

 

 

 

2.) Big Egos and let’s admit we all love this big game-- Another huge reason that feeds terrorism is that leaders both in the West and Islamic nations are more worried about flaunting their egos than pursuing peace. Nobody wants to make concessions, in their hearts the power wielding leaders know that they will always have power and money and do not see how bringing peace at the expense of their egos will benefit them. So, both calls for Jihad and Crusade feed each other.

 

 

 

What is even worse most of the common folks, the masses themselves show this trend. Thanks to media and populists this whole ”clash of civilizations’ thing has become a fun game for West and the East. When suicide bombers blow themselves up, CNN and other Networks are dumb enough to broadcast videos of rejoicing Muslims. You bet Al Jazeera does the same when it shows the images of Muslims getting slaughtered by Israeli or Western forces, their homes getting blown up by powerful weapons. People’s emotions are stirred against each other to fuel hatred. This tit for tat game becomes addictive and people want to keep on playing it both for fun and vindictiveness. Peace is out of the question when people don’t want it in the first place.

 

 

 

3.) Terrorism is a massive business for both sides– As already mentioned leaders in the Islamic world as well as in the West derive their support from the same source- Terrorism- that they both accuse each other of. Osama Bin Laden becomes a Islamic hero because he claims to fight Crusaders. George W. Bush etc. win votes for fighting Jihadists. The West even creates enormous new bureaucratic departments, intelligence agencies to fight this new threat. Armies are deployed in foreign countries. Weapons companies make billions of dollars which I’m sure are shared by government agencies who give out contracts. Can you guess Why Donald Rumsfeld was so much in love with the war thing? It was his business as in money maker and power justifier.

 

 

 

 

SOLUTIONS.

 

 

 

1.) Foreign direct investment and free trade relations with Islamic countries, industrialization, development of service based economies in the Islamic societies that in turn will open up their societies; expose them to liberal ideas, education, culture, tolerance and in the long run- hopefully- civil liberties, religious freedom. Prosperity indeed makes people too busy and too happy to go off to foreign lands as suicide bombers to get a comfortable place in heaven with 72 virgins (male or female). Smaller prosperous nations like UAE, Bahrain, Qatar and in South East Asia, Malaysia are too busy doing the business and interested in progressive pursuits to bother about suicide bombings against people who they have nothing against in the first place.

 

 

 

2.) Counter extremist education and media outlets– For once we need good quality TV, Radio stations that emphasize the importance of peace, tolerance, free trade, mutual understanding between Islam and Western Christianity/ West and East. These TV and Radio channels should also have lots of non news entertainment (like dubbed and subtitled movies, Sitcoms, TV dramas) and infotainment (modeled after History channel, National Geographic, Discovery channel etc. that should have Middle East history, culture, public affairs, society, civil liberties and East-West harmony as their focus) content. Propagandist short wave radio stations are not very good models.

 

 

 

3.) Marketing peace– Peace must be marketed as a great incentive not preached as a chore. In Islamic countries people should be made aware of the fruits of peace: prosperity, stability, free trade, better quality of life for families and future generations.

 

Peace will indubitably make Islamist leaders jobless. Their leadership, energy, intelligence and influence must be channeled in different directions. They can head democratic, civil governments. They can share power like Hamas (governing Hamas will prove to be a good thing in the long run and it also makes it easy for West to do business with it that way) In no way, should these leaders and rulers be rendered unemployed. The result will be the same as the devastating effects in Iraq after firing Baathist bureaucracy, disbanding army and police.

 

 

 

In the West where huge counter-terrorism agencies have become great employers… those jobs should be transfered to diplomatic and trade departments, peace and inter-cultural study centers and institutions. Weapons companies should invest their capital and technical prowess in civil ventures, technologies and developing infrastructure in less developed Middle Eastern countries.

 

 

 

4.) Promotion of religious tolerance and harmony between two civilizations- Both religious and civil organizations in East and West should promote religious tolerance and harmony. Islam, Judaism and Christianity have striking similarities and similar origins. The attempt must not be to enmesh these religions but to come to an understanding that they have equal right to exist individually. Fundamentalist Christians who spread Islamophobia should be embarrassed by peace institutes and responsible press and media. Same job should be done in Islamic countries by their media, press and peace organizations. West should seriously ask Islamic countries to accept religious freedoms. Apostasy and anti- conversion laws must be abolished in Islamic countries. Christians should be able to promote Christianity (on agreed terms) and operate churches just as Muslims are allowed to promote Islam and operate Mosques in the West.

 

Exchange of quality classic and modern Literature- There is already good appreciation of Sufi Islam, ancient Persian Literature in the West (poetry of Rumi and Robayat of Omar Khayyam), Arabian Nights. But unlike other non Western countries (especially non English speaking)  -like India, Japan, Russia, Eastern Europe, African countries- there is not much exchange taking place in the field of Literature. It would be great to have increased number of translated works of quality literature from Arab World, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan and rest of the Muslim world.  Similarly great works of English literature must be translated into good literary Arabic and Persian.  I’m sure works like Tess of D’ubervilles, The great Gatsby, To kill a mockingbird, Pride and Prejudice, Anne of Green Gables, Wuthering Heights,  Les Miserables, Lord of the Rings, Chronicles of Narnia, Middlesex, works of Shakespeare, Mark Twain, John Steinbeck, Philip Roth, Ellie Wiesel, James Michener etc. -to name a few- translated into Arabic and Persian would be appreciated on different levels and give Islamic world insights into Western culture, civilization and values.

 

 

 

Liberal religious organizations like Quakers, Unitarians, other liberal Christian churches should unite to increase cross religious and cross cultural links. Governments should provide funding and grants to such ventures.

 

 

 

The Western countries must take a very strong stand on human rights violations in Islamic countries, oppression of minorities and women, honor killings. Surely if Christian conservatives can do multi- billion dollar business with the Royal family of Saudi Arabia they can also make it clear that they should finally normalize the status of women and recognize them as free human beings.

 

 

 

5.) If there are still loony folks around they must be thrown into loony bins and prisons. If these loonies are in public offices or government they must be forced to resign or voted out of power.

 

6.) USE HUMOR- Clue: Publishing Mohammad cartoons in newspapers may not be a very good idea. By the way, those newspapers claim that it is brave to do so are wrong. They are just playing. If they were serious about screwed up Islamic societies they would also be publishing well researched and stimulating articles on Female Genital mutilation, honor killings and execution of LGBT communities in Islamic countries.

 

Ember Endorsements: Go Obama and McCain. January 29, 2008

Filed under: News, Opinion, Personal, USA, World, politics — emberglow @ 6:14 pm
Tags: , , , ,

I am just writing this post for the record. Months and months ago while discussing upcoming American Presidential elections with my online friends (mostly American) I had hazarded a guess about the possible President to be. My choices were: Barack Obama from the D camp and Rudy Giuliani from the R camp. While Rudy has seriously screwed up his chances by shoddy and smug campaign, Obama has risen as the star for new politics and new things of substance.

 

Months ago, my good friends had suggested that- from D camp- Obama is immature and Hilary will win the day as she got the right connections and the money and two timer in the White House as husband. But I disagreed. She always came across as a power hungry phony to me. It was a dangerous thing to say back then because Mrs. Clinton has always been a very respected figure, but in the recent times she has definitely made her phoniness apparent in collusion with her tag team partner and husband. I think American people suspected her lack of mettle from the very beginning in Iowa and the initial polls in New Hampshire. She won New Hampshire with a slight margin only because of pity vote as she cried her way to a wafer thin victory.

 

I probably shouldn’t be saying all this because-yet- she may very well become President and nuke this part of the world where I write my missives from. But I am expressing my unabashed opinion. February 5th, the grand Tuesday, will seal the fate and I hope it will be in Barack Obama’s favor. His election will only confirm all that is good, noble and sound about America.

 

As a final word, I also support and endorse John Mccain from the R camp as he is a person of substance and great moral courage.

 

Murder of Zahra Kazemi and time for Tough Talk. November 28, 2007

I really cannot believe that I am having to write this to some educated, seemingly decent, ”Catholic” blonde woman who lives in UK……

 

 

 

After finding THIS BLOG I ended up posting an odd comment there. The one mentioned in my last post about freedom of speech. The simple discussion led me to her other post, ”Amnesty International, Iran and Propaganda” and I am not saying this out of some childish rivalry or anything but I personally found it a very disturbing read. Just visit the link to the post and let me know what you think. But what really disturbed me was this blogger’s insensitive treatment of Zahra Kazemi’s tragedy. I never thought on the other end of the political spectrum there could exist the antithesis of Anne Coulter…. In the true spirit of a friendly debate- which does not mean agreeing to each other, I post this comment for people who might have or harbor such notions:



emberglow Says:
28 November, 2007 at 3:45 am


I appreciate your taking so much time to do a lengthy write up. NO big organization, entity, publication etc. is objective or error,corruption free. If something exists on such a large scale there will always be cracks somewhere. I recently wrote a post about how I like New York Times for many reasons despite it’s obvious or not so obvious misgivings. Amnesty International is a big bureaucracy too. But you cannot trash it altogether and other human rights organizations and reliable sources.



Now let me come to the second point. As much as I admire your resolve to counter ”Islamophobia” I am appalled by your blatant prejudice. I myself hate Islamophobia and its creators. For example this is my lengthy post on Mark Steyn and people like him: CLICK FOR LINK



But at the same time it is important to criticize human rights violations, related crimes in any country of the world. Police torture and custodial deaths are the norm in most eastern countries, not just Iran. You begin talking about Kazemi’s case and then suddenly trash it and move on:

 

 

”The Kazemi case is only a human rights violation if the Iranian version of events is untrue, which AI can’t possibly know. Otherwise it’s just an accidental death in police custody. So why mention it three years on?”


She was a journalist. If she wanted to discover the truth and ”violated” laws or restrictions she should be praised for her bravery. But you make her into a ”criminal” and then you embrace the evidence of Iranian news agency IRNA and Iranian government ”inquiry” and reject the international community, Human rights groups, government of Canada, where Kazemi had gained citizenship and where her family resides. Her son in Canada, Stephan Hachemi, still believes that his mother was tortured, raped and murdered. Is he supporting international anti- Iran propaganda? Maybe he is getting paid for it? huh ?


If you cannot sympathize with the most cruel, unjust, barbaric rape and murder of a woman…,do you also have no sympathy for Kazemi’s surviving family just because you choose to think it is all anti- Iran propaganda? I really don’t know what is driving your maniacal prejudices, and, let’s say, Islamophilia/Iranophilia that so tragically blinds your mind and clouds your judgment.


Please wake up!

 

The role of religion in the Middle East conflicts November 27, 2007

This may sound like an extremely hackneyed title but I am writing this in response to tons of reports, intelligence, journalistic write ups, debates that go on and on and on about the Middle East history, ethnic and religious demographics, politics, international law, terrorism etc. Here, from my observation I will put it in very simple words, Warped and misguided Religion feeds all violence in Middle East, so you gotta shoot that down first before you do any negotiations.

 

Similar was my views expressed to David Wearing, who is doubtlessly a very keen and concerned observer of Middle Eastern affairs. He took part in almost marathon email debate with The Guardian newspaper journalist on Iranian intentions about its secretive nuclear program. Here is a link to his page and post titled, ”The Iran threat – exchange with George Monbiot” He focused a great deal on the phrase of Ahmadinejad, ”Wiping Israel off the map”. I commented that the study of semantic is a waste of time as Iranian intentions and populist leadership’s intentions for wanting to annihilate (whatever it may mean) Israel have been made clear quite often, including on their state owned media. I also urged him to focus on the religious element as well and here is the bit from my comment:

 

 

”But you completely ignore one element. RELIGION. Both Jews and Muslims can justify a war like anything and may even feel compelled to start one at any time, depending on which godly frequency they’re tuned to at a given time. Heck, even Dubya said God sent him to Iraq. I know I am making it sound funny but this paragraph is of the gravest nature, so mark my words.”

 

 

By the way, I also question international community’s moral right from stopping Iran from developing nuclear technologies. I really see weird disjointed logic and hypocrisy. North Korea has developed nuclear technology and the bomb, so did India and Pakistan. Nobody is asking them to disarm or destroy their atomic toys. Indeed the US is passionately seeking to help India in taming the atom so it can be unleashed later for whatever reasons. But I am veering away from the main subject of this post. So let me finish in the next paragraph.

 

About a week ago, I was searching for Israeli or Jewish bloggers to get a balanced view of the Israel-Palestine situation. I came across a blog from this young Jewish guy, in his early 20s, who wrote about the daily happenings in Israel from Israel, away from diplomatic, journalistic claptrap and negotiations in Norway or some other bleak location in USA. There was one post where he mourned the death of two young Israelis killed in a rocket attack fired by the terrorists (whichever ones they may have been) It was a moving post and a heartfelt obituary where he offered his condolences to the family of the deceased. In the very last sentence he prayed for peace and prayed that their deaths will be ”AVENGED”. That’s a real damning word.

 

 

Here is the contrast I suppose. While Christianity– in the true sense, there are strange ”Christian” sects though who think Armageddon etc. are going to unfold out of the current situations in Middle East– is the religion of peace, forgiveness, letting go, loving and praying for your enemies; both Judaism and Islam seem heavily intent on revenge. Maybe this very basic instinct and culture of revenge is inflated, flamed and exploited to the best interests of corrupt and neurotic fundamentalists on both sides?

 

On Canada’s BBC and freedom of speech for Neo Nazis November 27, 2007

As a shameless act of self- promotion I felt tempted to post here two of my comments left on two different blogs. There are two reasons for this: first, I wanted to leave a bit of a lighter after some rather dense posts. Second, I wanted to express my opinion for record’s sake. So here they are:

 

 

 

 

1.) This was from some Blog about human rights violations in China that reproduced Canadian newspaper National Post’s news report, ‘‘Covering up slaughter, with a little help from the CBC”. This report mentions rather diabolical allegations that the Chinese government is involved in mass slaughter of Falun Gong members. Not only that, the Chinese authorities are disemboweling them to sell their organs on the market. I know it sounds like a very morbid conspiracy theory, but actually it has been verified by very credible sources like veteran former Canadian member of Parliament Mr. David Kilgour on his website. But of course the initial topic was that Canada’s public broadcaster CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) cowered under Chinese government pressure when it decided not to broadcast a documentary (or the vital parts of it) that investigated the serious allegations. I was tempted to make this short comment:


”If China can kick out BBC, Shut up Rupert Murdoch, Yahoo, Google…. then…. who the hell is CBC?”



2.) Now we come to the other blog whose writer and readers passionately and ”vehemently” supported Holocaust deniers’ freedom of speech. The two of them being, David Irwing and Nick Griffin. This issue has been on my mind for quite some time but was buried under others priorities and concerns. I was fortunate to have come across this post. This gave me an opportunity to suggest a solution to this debate and also express my opinion and sentiments. So here is my humble comment:


 

”Maybe we should send these folks to Iran on a tax payer funded public holiday or call it Sabbatical (nothing to do with Sabbath Day).

 

 

 

I am sure Mr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would greatly respect their freedom of expression. They can get it out of their system to their heart’s content, maybe go on prime time Al Jazeera and come back safely. What you think?”

 

To this the blogger replies:

 

 

 

Or maybe having giving a platform to fascist, they should have invited a genuine antifascist, like Ahmadinejad to speak at the Oxford Union. He’d get a more intelligent and polite reception than he did at CUNY”.



To which I yet again humbly reply:


I don’t think Ahmadinejad would be all that welcome. He would be hooted down and booted out the moment he opens his mouth about Homosexuality.”

 

Something about The New York Times November 26, 2007

In one little sentence, The New York Times is great.**CLICK HERE TO VISIT THEIR GREAT WEBSITE)** But of course it is often bitterly (from ”conservatives”) and sometimes idealistically (Noam Chomsky, Gore Vidal, Columbia Journalism Review) criticized for its coverage. Of course I do not worship New York Times as I used to as a teenager. It certainly is a business wanting to make money and has a political agenda that usually serves liberal and Democratic party interests. But like any humongous entity it is bound to have cracks, errors, corruption, scandals etc. But it has survived and stood tall.

 

My real introduction to New York Times was in 1999 when I got internet for the first time. I had always heard about it but never had laid an eye on it. (Fact: To this day I have never held the original paper copy of NYT in my hands as even the best libraries in New Zealand, both public and academic, do not subscribe to NYT in paper form) But internet access changed it. At the age of 19 it completely satisfied my extreme lust for international affairs, American issues, intellectual stimulation and good writing. I remember, my dial up connection used to be pitifully slow and it cost me for the time I was online. So I used to cheat. I discovered that by making little tweaks in the URL address of news stories I can open all articles for printers, which means all text and no graphics or ads. So, everyday I would quickly download several articles, save them, disconnect internet and read them at my own leisure.



Then I came to New Zealand to study media in 2002. I was introduced to Noam Chomsky and many other resources. New York Times was not the infallible broadsheet it once was. I did not read it all that much. In 2005 I was so incensed with ”TIMES SELECT” (the subscription only sections), I completely stopped reading NYT. I think I even shot a couple of angry emails to NYT. The most annoying bit was, I would get links to NYT stories in Google news and My Yahoo, click on them and be asked to subscribe to TIMES SELECT before I could read! But TIMES SELECT was a flop. It displeased readers, alienated them and the NYT writers. Moreover, many Bloggers would just copy paste articles and make them available to the world for free.



So, in September 2007 NYT decided to scrap TIMES SELECT. I’ve had lots of free time for the last one week and compulsively started reading on the web only then I got to know about the death of TIMES SELECT. And boy am I happy… I have been surfing the delightful maze of a Website of NYT with passion and pleasure. I don’t read it just for News and Politics but also for great writing. The sections on science and technology and especially books and writers are just super awesome. The New York Times is here to stay.



I just read this article from Michele Malkin’s website, CLICK TO READ> New York Times hits new 5-year low”. It is almost laughable when ”conservative” writers feel compelled to condemn almost everything they fear as ”liberal media”. I have been visiting lots of conservative blogs and they all religiously drub NYT as the part of their ”conservative” intellectual underpinning. As for the dropped sales, I believe it might be the result of NYT stand on War in Iraq and people’s displeasure with it, TIMES SELECT, rise of internet news services. But it is comforting to know that NYT has not turned into a crowd pleaser like Fox News and various other ”Conservative” media and writers. But here is just one question: Where else do these people suggest we should go? Washington Times? or New York Post? DO YOU HEAR SOMETHING? This is the sound of my skin crawling and my brain screaming.


And what is a NYT 5 year low anyway? Let’s say Michele Malkin’s readership and credibility trebled in the same period. So what would it be now? Up from 0.00000001% to 0.0001% of the total readers ? She sure has benefited from The New York Times’ temporarily declining readership.

 

Free Trade VS Freedom November 26, 2007

The Times of London’s website carried this news story, CLICK TO READ, ”French leader goes quiet on human rights”. This story shows the disturbing trend among the Western countries to greedily pursue trade relations with autocratic and criminal regimes at the expense of suffering humanity. Many corporate giants have been blamed for running sweat shops in many parts of the Third World where working conditions are exploitative, wages are minimal and children too are employed as laborers. The New York Times’ Nicholas D. Kritof has a differing view on sweat shops though which he opines help starving third world people to pull themselves out of extreme poverty. But he must be talking about few polished and benign sweat shops that he visited (or was taken to) on his tours to China. But the esteemed governments of Western countries are no different from these sleazy big businesses, maybe because they’re funded by them?

 

 

 

Nowhere, does this trend of greed become more conspicuous than the Western trade relations vis-a-vis China. The above Times news report records,

 

 

”President Sarkozy will avoid public criticism on human rights when he tries to persuade China to make France its top European partner on a state visit to Beijing today…The last French president, an expert on oriental culture and a regular visitor to China, was appreciated by the leadership for his resistance to US power in Asia, but he failed to win the commercial favour for France that is enjoyed by Germany and Britain. Mr Sarkozy, who has taken seven ministers and 40 businessmen with him, is setting out what he calls his policy of “new realism”…”



It is clear that Free Trade is not all cool as the free traders would have us believe. Notably, Down Under, Australia too has shown the similar reluctance to bringing human rights violations in China to the table. Indeed China is now Australia’s biggest trading partner leaving USA and Japan behind. Click here to read, ”China emerges as our biggest trade partner” from The Australian newspaper. Australian government has been in a very tight spot over Chinese Asylum seekers in Australia, especially the ones who do so before international media like Chen Yonglin in June 2005. Click to read, ” China defector accuses Australia” from BBC news website.

 

This blog is not pointing accusing fingers or calling this ”realism” totally wrong. This blog sort of understands people’s basic need to survive or on the other hand to feed on caviar and ride flashy cars and own bigger homes. This blog is only pointing towards the hypocrisy of those (especially UNETHICAL big businesses and their lackeys) who cry for FREE TRADE FOR FREEDOM. The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that Free trade results in pushing human rights concerns on the back burner. Human rights and liberties are sacrificed on the altar of FREE TRADE. So, this blog wishes to ask just one question only. What is so FREE about the FREE TRADE?

 

An opinion on the current state of War in Iraq August 18, 2007

d2a7.jpg

Picture: Map of Iraq with major cities and bordering countries.

 

Well, this was in response to a latest Washington Post story ‘‘Nonpartisan Group Calls for Three-State Split in Iraq” . It proposes that Iraq be split into three autonomous regions that will share natural resources. For the layperson Iraqi population is divided into many ethnic groups but the largest of them are:

 

Ethnic Divisions–Arabs (about 70% of the population, all of them Muslims)
Kurds (About 20-22% of the population, most of them Muslims, who mostly live in the Northern parts of Iraq and also have big Kurdish population in neighboring countries; Syria, Iran, Turkey, See the map.)

 

Religious Divisions–To make the jumble of diversity more confusing Iraqis are religiously divided as well. Almost 97% of them are Muslims. But Islam is divided in two warring groups; Shiite Muslims (about 60-65%) and Sunni Muslims (about 32-37%). Most Shiite Muslims live in the Southern parts of Iran though. Whenever I notice this crazy mixture the Balkan states ( especially former Yugoslavia) in Europe come to my mind. But that’s a different story anyway. Personally, I have always supported the idea of creating. at least 3 autonomous regions in Iraq. And in this regard following are my comments to Washington Post story:

 

Indeed this solution must have been considered in the beginning and even before the beginning of this wishful war to ”free Iraq”. What Iraq has always needed in the first place is freedom from itself.

 

 

Different ethnicities that inhabit Iraq remain bitterly opposed to each other on countless levels. They must exist independently of each other. This will not only give them better protection from ghoulish violence, security and freedom but also make them ultimately responsible for their own destiny that they ought to build themselves.
I think it is time we get past calling Iraq war a mistake because it is a well established fact anyhow. Now time is to move on and look for unanimous enduring solutions for Iraqis.

 

It is such sad state of affairs that people are still confined to their own narrow interests; political or ideological. As a result no sincere action is being taken. There are two shallow opinion blocs on Iraq war. One wants to continue drubbing Republicans/Conservatives for political gains while not having any sincerity towards fixing Iraq’s chaos. The other bloc- finding itself badly mired in Iraq- wants to RUN AWAY as soon as possible,especially as war in Iraq offers no political mileage at home (USA) anymore and body bags are coming back wrapped in American flags.

 

In reality, Iraq has become another Vietnam, only it can’t be left alone by convenient military evacuation. So it’s time that all people/politicians of good intentions in America and international community stop the blame games and strive for lasting solutions.

 

Creating autonomous three regions sounds like a good idea to begin with. After that the issue of fair sharing of Oil revenues can be tackled.