Thoughts, Freedom Watch and Random Notes from Ember

This blog attempts to give you a politically incorrect, independent, alternative and insightful view of the world, away from commercial broadsheets. I BELIEVE IN PEOPLE POWER. Please empower, encourage, inform, inspire me and this blog with your valuable feedback or donation.

The role of religion in the Middle East conflicts November 27, 2007

This may sound like an extremely hackneyed title but I am writing this in response to tons of reports, intelligence, journalistic write ups, debates that go on and on and on about the Middle East history, ethnic and religious demographics, politics, international law, terrorism etc. Here, from my observation I will put it in very simple words, Warped and misguided Religion feeds all violence in Middle East, so you gotta shoot that down first before you do any negotiations.

 

Similar was my views expressed to David Wearing, who is doubtlessly a very keen and concerned observer of Middle Eastern affairs. He took part in almost marathon email debate with The Guardian newspaper journalist on Iranian intentions about its secretive nuclear program. Here is a link to his page and post titled, ”The Iran threat – exchange with George Monbiot” He focused a great deal on the phrase of Ahmadinejad, ”Wiping Israel off the map”. I commented that the study of semantic is a waste of time as Iranian intentions and populist leadership’s intentions for wanting to annihilate (whatever it may mean) Israel have been made clear quite often, including on their state owned media. I also urged him to focus on the religious element as well and here is the bit from my comment:

 

 

”But you completely ignore one element. RELIGION. Both Jews and Muslims can justify a war like anything and may even feel compelled to start one at any time, depending on which godly frequency they’re tuned to at a given time. Heck, even Dubya said God sent him to Iraq. I know I am making it sound funny but this paragraph is of the gravest nature, so mark my words.”

 

 

By the way, I also question international community’s moral right from stopping Iran from developing nuclear technologies. I really see weird disjointed logic and hypocrisy. North Korea has developed nuclear technology and the bomb, so did India and Pakistan. Nobody is asking them to disarm or destroy their atomic toys. Indeed the US is passionately seeking to help India in taming the atom so it can be unleashed later for whatever reasons. But I am veering away from the main subject of this post. So let me finish in the next paragraph.

 

About a week ago, I was searching for Israeli or Jewish bloggers to get a balanced view of the Israel-Palestine situation. I came across a blog from this young Jewish guy, in his early 20s, who wrote about the daily happenings in Israel from Israel, away from diplomatic, journalistic claptrap and negotiations in Norway or some other bleak location in USA. There was one post where he mourned the death of two young Israelis killed in a rocket attack fired by the terrorists (whichever ones they may have been) It was a moving post and a heartfelt obituary where he offered his condolences to the family of the deceased. In the very last sentence he prayed for peace and prayed that their deaths will be ”AVENGED”. That’s a real damning word.

 

 

Here is the contrast I suppose. While Christianity– in the true sense, there are strange ”Christian” sects though who think Armageddon etc. are going to unfold out of the current situations in Middle East– is the religion of peace, forgiveness, letting go, loving and praying for your enemies; both Judaism and Islam seem heavily intent on revenge. Maybe this very basic instinct and culture of revenge is inflated, flamed and exploited to the best interests of corrupt and neurotic fundamentalists on both sides?

 

On Canada’s BBC and freedom of speech for Neo Nazis November 27, 2007

As a shameless act of self- promotion I felt tempted to post here two of my comments left on two different blogs. There are two reasons for this: first, I wanted to leave a bit of a lighter after some rather dense posts. Second, I wanted to express my opinion for record’s sake. So here they are:

 

 

 

 

1.) This was from some Blog about human rights violations in China that reproduced Canadian newspaper National Post’s news report, ‘‘Covering up slaughter, with a little help from the CBC”. This report mentions rather diabolical allegations that the Chinese government is involved in mass slaughter of Falun Gong members. Not only that, the Chinese authorities are disemboweling them to sell their organs on the market. I know it sounds like a very morbid conspiracy theory, but actually it has been verified by very credible sources like veteran former Canadian member of Parliament Mr. David Kilgour on his website. But of course the initial topic was that Canada’s public broadcaster CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) cowered under Chinese government pressure when it decided not to broadcast a documentary (or the vital parts of it) that investigated the serious allegations. I was tempted to make this short comment:


”If China can kick out BBC, Shut up Rupert Murdoch, Yahoo, Google…. then…. who the hell is CBC?”



2.) Now we come to the other blog whose writer and readers passionately and ”vehemently” supported Holocaust deniers’ freedom of speech. The two of them being, David Irwing and Nick Griffin. This issue has been on my mind for quite some time but was buried under others priorities and concerns. I was fortunate to have come across this post. This gave me an opportunity to suggest a solution to this debate and also express my opinion and sentiments. So here is my humble comment:


 

”Maybe we should send these folks to Iran on a tax payer funded public holiday or call it Sabbatical (nothing to do with Sabbath Day).

 

 

 

I am sure Mr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would greatly respect their freedom of expression. They can get it out of their system to their heart’s content, maybe go on prime time Al Jazeera and come back safely. What you think?”

 

To this the blogger replies:

 

 

 

Or maybe having giving a platform to fascist, they should have invited a genuine antifascist, like Ahmadinejad to speak at the Oxford Union. He’d get a more intelligent and polite reception than he did at CUNY”.



To which I yet again humbly reply:


I don’t think Ahmadinejad would be all that welcome. He would be hooted down and booted out the moment he opens his mouth about Homosexuality.”

 

Shady maze of Foreign Affairs leads to Russian brides November 27, 2007

Policy makers and bureaucrats can be dumb or plain blind. Let’s be kind to them and say maybe they do so on purpose? Sometimes I think the common dude or chic on the street got much more common sense than academics, senior policy analysts, policy makers, advisers and so on. Take American foreign policy for example. I thought I would do some readings off Foreign Affairs journal that is published by the reputed and extremely influential Council on Foreign Relations, which has elite and powerful membership, not to mention millions of dollars in funding.

 

 

 

Anyhow, as I said I wanted to read some articles from Foreign Affairs magazine. But the very start was ominous. Instead of going to www.foreignaffairs.org I went to www.foreignaffairs.com. It changed the entire meaning of the phrase Foreign Affairs. The site with ”.com” at the end promised me, ”RUSSIAN BRIDES, ADULT DATING, RUSSIAN WIFE, ADULT MOVIE”… and so on. For once I almost thought that it was Council on Foreign Relations’ conspiracy to destroy my free and happy bachelor life. So, I killed the page by clicking it close. Then I retried and went to the official website of Foreign Affairs journal. A few articles I read were quite boring despite my extreme interest in International relations.

 

 

 

But well, I was in for worse. I read an article by, none other than Mr. R. Nicholas Burns, who is, ”the United States Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, the Department of State’s third ranking official. Appointed by President George W. Bush, he was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on March 17, 2005 and was sworn into office by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. As Under Secretary, he oversees U.S. policy in each region of the world and serves in the senior career Foreign Service position at the Department.”

 

 

 

The State Department’s third ranking official? Hmmm… And this article, ”America’s Strategic Opportunity With India” was the intolerably insufferable misleading Schmaltz and glib. I won’t go into details but quote this little bit, ”We share an attachment to democracy and individual rights founded on an instinctive mistrust of authoritarianism.” How the hell editors of the journal let this sentence slip into print?? I am not going to play any blame games here but everyone knows that’s not Indian values or Asian values or any other region’s values, maybe not even European values. Culturally India is a thoroughly and even dictatorially collectivist society and I put it literally as well as in the very Ayn Randian, Objectivist sense. As for the passionately sought ”civil” nuclear deal between U.S. and India, even the liberal New York Times has been warning against it for such a long time as in this editorial, ”A Bad Deal Gets Worse”

 

 

 

But don’t take my word or New York Times’ for it. I would just like to ask Mr. Nicholas Burns to confirm if he is the third most senior person in the same State Department that released this Report on Human Rights Practices in India in March 2007? If this is how Council on Foreign Relations and the State Department are going to operate than U.S. tax payers, U.S. voters, civil democratic international community and international human rights agencies should have lots of questions to ask…