Thoughts, Freedom Watch and Random Notes from Ember

This blog attempts to give you a politically incorrect, independent, alternative and insightful view of the world, away from commercial broadsheets. I BELIEVE IN PEOPLE POWER. Please empower, encourage, inform, inspire me and this blog with your valuable feedback or donation.

What is a Black American? Language of politics and race November 30, 2007

Believe it or not, the color of skin remains a very defining character in a human being’s life, despite liberal ideals and politically correct slogans. Race relations is the subject and concern of the Western world and its importance will only increase in the times to come. That’s because Western countries are the only countries where racial diversity is found because of their history, colonial past, globalization, immigration and interracial couples. One may argue there are lots of races or ethnicities in non Wester countries. Yes, but those are more like sub ethnicities or sub races that have- more or less- resembling cultures and customs, as in China, India, Indonesia, African countries.

 

 

But in the Western World probably there is no country in the world where race seems to matter more than in America. This is not because Americans are racist (they’re much less racist and least xenophobic than most countries of the world) but because America is racially and demographically too diverse. But as other races have managed to assimilate into Americana, the Blacks or Afro Americans have always stood out and remained isolated. There are barely any bridges between Black and White in America. They live in their own universes, for better or worse.

 


But I want to dig a bit deeper and understand the psychology of this racial isolation and refusal to cross over to the other sides of their own race, Black or Afro American in this case. I remember watching great Larry David’s (creator of Seinfeld) wonderful comedy program on DVD called ‘‘Curb Your Enthusiasm” in which Larry plays the real life Larry in comic style. Larry David and his wife also have a Black woman friend (played by Wanda Sykes). Often race is used in the sitcom for humorous effect and sarcasm. In one episode Wanda wants Larry’s reference to get a job. One day they meet on the street in LA and Wanda asks if Larry has already put in a good word for her. Then Wanda complains how come Larry forgot to mention that she was a Black woman with Brown skin. I think it was just a priceless satire. Kudos to Larry David, Wanda Sykes and the rest of the crew.

 


Obama is not Black, not enough- And here I come almost to the final paragraph. What is a Black American then? Do you know, in American Presidential campaign there are more Black voters who are voting for Hilary Clinton than Barack Obama, who in return is gaining a lot of White votes. Why? Is it so that despite the media coverage that tags Obama as the Black Presidential candidate is actually a person of mixed race? Let’s say bi-racial, who has a White mother and a Black (Kenyan African) father. Naturally, Obama is brown and biracial not Black. Maybe he is not fit enough to represent the Blacks. Here is the New York Times Op-ed that produced this post from me: ”Obama’s Color line”. It notes, ”The alienation, anger and pessimism that mark speeches from major black American leaders are missing from Mr. Obama’s speeches.

 


Is Being Alienated, angry and pessimistic, being Black? Why is it that when Blacks become successful, ”they act White” and are not Blacks anymore. Colin Powell was never touted as a Black hero. But wait, his skin is too light. Let’s look elsewhere… Condoleezza Rice? But she ain’t much popular Black hero either. Then, I suppose, she must be acting White….

 

Bad news sells: What is so appealing about tragedies and sadness? November 30, 2007

Why all bad news is good news?

 

 

USA: Diabolical government and CIA, Conspiracy theories, illegal immigration from Latinos and Muslims, Neo Imperialism, Freemasons, New World Order, corruption, TERRORISM, racism, poverty, drug trafficking, breaking out of all sorts of illnesses and falling economy.

 


Europe: World Wars, Holocaust, falling birth rates, dying out of White race, moral decadence, loss of values and Christian morals, invasion of immigrants and Muslims, spread of Islam into Europe, crippling social security systems, declining economies, rise of the right wing, xenophobia, rise of anarchy, crime and dictatorships in the Central, Eastern Europe and Russia.

 


Asia, Africa, Arab world and the rest: Huge natural calamities, disasters, death tolls, horrendous corruption, wars, genocide, AIDS, Fundamentalism, Female genital mutilation, Poverty, sex tourism industries for Western people fulfilling their every sexual fantasy including pedophilia, ever looming threats of big scale wars that may erupt any time and maybe engulf the whole world in a Third World War.

 

 

 

I have been trying to find the answer to this question since the time I realized, while reading literature, that the greatest novels considered ”classics” are mostly tragic and sad. Not only that, the authors or artists who happen to have a tragic life or commit suicide often see the sales of their works shoot sky-high, after they’re lowered into the grave. Later while studying media, I realized that anything newsworthy must be ominous. If you have some interest in literature then you may not have necessarily read but would have heard about the great Greek tragedies, Shakespearean tragedies etc.

 

 

The writers who have written extensively end up writing their ”masterpieces” that are tragic. Charles Dickens’ greatest novels are not the likes of Pickwick Papers but David Copperfield. Shakespeare’s tragedies far outweigh the critical praise and popularity of his comedies. Here are two quotes to consider about human love affair with sadness or the romance of sorrow (Despite the ever resounding slogans urging people, ”Hey! You should laugh lots and you should stay happy man!” and ”Don’t worry be happy”):


 

 

 

“For the Great Gaels of Ireland

Are the men that God made mad,

For all their wars are merry

And all their songs are sad.”

From Ballad of the White Horse by G.K. Chesterton.

 

 

And here is the second one


”Our sweetest songs are those that tell of saddest thought.”

By English poet P.B. Shelley


So…? What’s the idea? Is it a great international conspiracy (or hypocrisy) to urge everyone to be happy but at the same time to be in love with sorrow, secretly?

 

When a young Muslim man comes to live with an American family November 29, 2007

Filed under: Life, Love, Race Relations, Religion, Terrorism, USA, World — emberglow @ 8:24 am
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

I just found this beautiful article from Christian Science Monitor, ”New friend, new views of the world”. On another September 11, a young Muslim man lands on US soil straight from Egypt. September 11 sounded like an ominous day to Pamela Freundl Kirst. She was anxious and felt ‘’somewhat threatened”. But the true story unfolds into a lesson in friendship and tolerance. 



I personally found Abdul’s customs and his strong will to stick to them, even though when he was by himself in America, somewhat strange. But as we see it works out well. It is not about converting each other but understanding each other. That’s pretty much my philosophy for world peace.  CLICK HERE TO  READ FULL STORY

 

Kindle- Amazon’s iPod for books. November 29, 2007

I am a nerdy nerdy nerd. I just read a blog post about ”Kindle” and posted a comment as my own review. I never knew Kindle has already kindled the markets! There are already 774 customer reviews at amazon.com!!! Well here you can read>> AMAZON’S KINDLE PAGE. and CNET’S Awesome Review too.

 

 

I know most of you technical new-agers who use Razor thin mobile phones, smart-phones, newest laptops, WiFi devices and of course Ipods are going to puke at the look of Kindle (that looks like a big old calculator). But I am just looking at the paper like look of its screen (in the pictures). And I am swooning….. But well, here is my own humble review to kindle the Kindle talk:

 

 

I love digital technologies to help readers. The main problem with reading books etc. on phone, palm tops is the battery life and small screen. Besides, those readers cannot be all that great because reading software is part of the device designed to do dozens of other things.

 

 

Despite my poverty, I have a Palm Tungston E2. It offers much longer battery life, almost- what they say- 7 hours (i think in reality its more like 4-5 hours). But even this I find quite annoyingly short. Second, issue is of course with the screen. Even a small paperback has much larger page. I hardly use it for reading now…

 

 

And of course, traditional books are so handy, come in different sizes and formats, no batteries to charge, the joys of flicking through the pages etc. So, if I have to have some digital solutions it has to come real close to the book. I read Kindle offers more than 7,000 page turns of battery life. This is awesome. The screen has a book like black and white look. And it has no other distracting functions.

 

 

 

As for reading New York Times on your phone for free, I guess, you still have to pay for the amount of data you download? Other than that, I cannot say more because I don’t own it. And as I am in New Zealand, I am sure I will be locked out of its functionalities and downloading functions…just as I bemoan not being able to enjoy great radio services like XM and Sirius… -(

 

 

Epilogue—Sony’s reader seems to be the real competitor. I also remember Franklin’s bookman book cards (and readers) had done serious work into marketing portable book readers but that never really took off in a big way. I think Franklin people could have introduced something like Kindle. But well…

 

Freedom quote and the Right to Privacy November 28, 2007

Filed under: Civil Rights, News, Opinion, USA, politics — emberglow @ 10:18 pm
Tags: , , , , , ,

”When the government is allowed to show up unannounced without a warrant and search people’s homes, it is bad news for all of us.”

 



 
Says New York Times in an editorial (A Loss for Privacy Rights) against unwarranted police searches in California (In breach of the 4th Amendment that forbids unreasonable searches and seizures) targeted at poor people who apply for social security.

 

Censorship: Are there any taboos left for novels and books? November 28, 2007

Filed under: Books, Literature, Opinion, Writers — emberglow @ 8:56 pm
Tags: , , , , , ,

WARNING:

 

 

 

Mature content please DO NOT read further if easily offended for personal or religious reasons.

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the history of novel writing, the 20th century has seen the revolution as fas as breaking the taboos is concerned. Novels containing taboo themes (openly challenging religious, political authorities and their systems, explicit adultery, incest, illicit sexual affairs), taboo words (fuck, cunt, shit plus so many other swear words and phrases… though it remains interesting how some words are gaining taboo status like nigger, fag, dyke.. READ Wikipedia article on Profanity), taboo subject matter (explicit, graphic and gratuitous violence, rape, killing, necrophilia) etc. were published. Here are some of the ground breaking novels and widely recognized as the ”firsts” and pioneers in their groundbreaking or taboo breaking. All titles contain links to their Amazon.com page where you can read other reviews or buy the book.

 

 

 

 

 

1.) Ulysses by James Joyce. First published in 1922 in Paris, banned in UK and USA. Contains irreverent or obscene scoffing of religion, explicit sexuality, fetishes, obscene language or expletives, scatological material and possibly coprophilia.

 

 

 

2.) Lady Chatterly’s Lover by D.H. Lawrence. Written and published privately in 1928 in Florence, Italy. Contains graphic and taboo, adulterous sexual affair shown in a sort of positive and gratuitous light, four letter expletives.

 

 

 

3.) Tropic of Cancer by Henry Miller. Published in Paris in 1934. Ground breaking in its frankness and directness of describing sexual affairs, sexual intercourse, genitalia etc. No novel had gone to such limits before in portraying graphic sex. Usually critic opinions range from ”trash” to ”one of the greatest novels” of 20th century.

 

 

 

 

4.) City and the Pillar by Gore Vidal. Published in 1948. Known as the first frank ”gay” novel that has a love affair between two young men as its plot. Gore Vidal often reminisces how even The New York Times had refused to review the novel because it was considered immoral or objectionable bythe ”liberal” newspaper at that time.

 

 

 

 

After and between the publication of these novels, so many writers and novels touched upon taboo subjects. Too many to name or remember probably. I would mention just one that stood out in 1990s and could be considered precursor of the sorts the modern shock novelists are writing today.

 

 

 

 

 

5.) American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis. Published in 1991. This novel packed– I suppose, with the apparent intention to shock and sell– graphic violence, rape, sexual violence against women, gratuitous killing, Sadism, necrophilia and even cannibalism.

 

 

 

 

But here is one question: What you think remains taboo today?? My personal reading of American Psycho was that, after a while you get bored with this genre. Maybe that’s the reason these are not categorized as classics. Now these novels are quite generic though they do sell well at times.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here is second question: Please mention books and writers that I omitted and you think they must be there in the list. Also, give me reasons why they’re taboo breakers? You can nominate your taboo books from any language, country or culture as long as you give me good references to the work.

 

Class system is still rife in UK, reports Guardian November 28, 2007

Filed under: News, Weird — emberglow @ 6:22 am
Tags: , , , ,

This news story from The Guardian newspaper in London, ”Riven by class and no social mobility – Britain in 2007” is kind of disconcerting and even depressing to read. Rest of the world has very romantic notions about Britain including England, Wales, Scotland. Millions of people want to go to UK from all over the world to visit, holiday, study, work and immigrate permanently. This trend is seen among the developed countries like USA, Canada, Australia as well as the developing countries in Asia, Eastern Europe, Africa etc.

 

 

 

I don’t know what the fuss is all about? Lots of people say many British people leave UK and live in other countries as expats because life is not all that nice (weather being the prime subject to moan about) and taxes are too high.

 

 

 

 


Anyway, this report notes that 89% people in UK say they’re judged by their class. The trends are not so different in Wales and Scotland. Working class people are very much likely to stay working class. Same is true with the middle class. Here is what report mentions:

 

”But many class attitudes have survived economic change. That suggests people are still judged by where they come from rather than how much they earn.”


This above quote from the story must appear as quite an uncool truth about UK to many readers I suppose? Well, wherever you’re from, express your thoughts in the comments section. Cheers.

 

Murder of Zahra Kazemi and time for Tough Talk. November 28, 2007

I really cannot believe that I am having to write this to some educated, seemingly decent, ”Catholic” blonde woman who lives in UK……

 

 

 

After finding THIS BLOG I ended up posting an odd comment there. The one mentioned in my last post about freedom of speech. The simple discussion led me to her other post, ”Amnesty International, Iran and Propaganda” and I am not saying this out of some childish rivalry or anything but I personally found it a very disturbing read. Just visit the link to the post and let me know what you think. But what really disturbed me was this blogger’s insensitive treatment of Zahra Kazemi’s tragedy. I never thought on the other end of the political spectrum there could exist the antithesis of Anne Coulter…. In the true spirit of a friendly debate- which does not mean agreeing to each other, I post this comment for people who might have or harbor such notions:



emberglow Says:
28 November, 2007 at 3:45 am


I appreciate your taking so much time to do a lengthy write up. NO big organization, entity, publication etc. is objective or error,corruption free. If something exists on such a large scale there will always be cracks somewhere. I recently wrote a post about how I like New York Times for many reasons despite it’s obvious or not so obvious misgivings. Amnesty International is a big bureaucracy too. But you cannot trash it altogether and other human rights organizations and reliable sources.



Now let me come to the second point. As much as I admire your resolve to counter ”Islamophobia” I am appalled by your blatant prejudice. I myself hate Islamophobia and its creators. For example this is my lengthy post on Mark Steyn and people like him: CLICK FOR LINK



But at the same time it is important to criticize human rights violations, related crimes in any country of the world. Police torture and custodial deaths are the norm in most eastern countries, not just Iran. You begin talking about Kazemi’s case and then suddenly trash it and move on:

 

 

”The Kazemi case is only a human rights violation if the Iranian version of events is untrue, which AI can’t possibly know. Otherwise it’s just an accidental death in police custody. So why mention it three years on?”


She was a journalist. If she wanted to discover the truth and ”violated” laws or restrictions she should be praised for her bravery. But you make her into a ”criminal” and then you embrace the evidence of Iranian news agency IRNA and Iranian government ”inquiry” and reject the international community, Human rights groups, government of Canada, where Kazemi had gained citizenship and where her family resides. Her son in Canada, Stephan Hachemi, still believes that his mother was tortured, raped and murdered. Is he supporting international anti- Iran propaganda? Maybe he is getting paid for it? huh ?


If you cannot sympathize with the most cruel, unjust, barbaric rape and murder of a woman…,do you also have no sympathy for Kazemi’s surviving family just because you choose to think it is all anti- Iran propaganda? I really don’t know what is driving your maniacal prejudices, and, let’s say, Islamophilia/Iranophilia that so tragically blinds your mind and clouds your judgment.


Please wake up!

 

The role of religion in the Middle East conflicts November 27, 2007

This may sound like an extremely hackneyed title but I am writing this in response to tons of reports, intelligence, journalistic write ups, debates that go on and on and on about the Middle East history, ethnic and religious demographics, politics, international law, terrorism etc. Here, from my observation I will put it in very simple words, Warped and misguided Religion feeds all violence in Middle East, so you gotta shoot that down first before you do any negotiations.

 

Similar was my views expressed to David Wearing, who is doubtlessly a very keen and concerned observer of Middle Eastern affairs. He took part in almost marathon email debate with The Guardian newspaper journalist on Iranian intentions about its secretive nuclear program. Here is a link to his page and post titled, ”The Iran threat – exchange with George Monbiot” He focused a great deal on the phrase of Ahmadinejad, ”Wiping Israel off the map”. I commented that the study of semantic is a waste of time as Iranian intentions and populist leadership’s intentions for wanting to annihilate (whatever it may mean) Israel have been made clear quite often, including on their state owned media. I also urged him to focus on the religious element as well and here is the bit from my comment:

 

 

”But you completely ignore one element. RELIGION. Both Jews and Muslims can justify a war like anything and may even feel compelled to start one at any time, depending on which godly frequency they’re tuned to at a given time. Heck, even Dubya said God sent him to Iraq. I know I am making it sound funny but this paragraph is of the gravest nature, so mark my words.”

 

 

By the way, I also question international community’s moral right from stopping Iran from developing nuclear technologies. I really see weird disjointed logic and hypocrisy. North Korea has developed nuclear technology and the bomb, so did India and Pakistan. Nobody is asking them to disarm or destroy their atomic toys. Indeed the US is passionately seeking to help India in taming the atom so it can be unleashed later for whatever reasons. But I am veering away from the main subject of this post. So let me finish in the next paragraph.

 

About a week ago, I was searching for Israeli or Jewish bloggers to get a balanced view of the Israel-Palestine situation. I came across a blog from this young Jewish guy, in his early 20s, who wrote about the daily happenings in Israel from Israel, away from diplomatic, journalistic claptrap and negotiations in Norway or some other bleak location in USA. There was one post where he mourned the death of two young Israelis killed in a rocket attack fired by the terrorists (whichever ones they may have been) It was a moving post and a heartfelt obituary where he offered his condolences to the family of the deceased. In the very last sentence he prayed for peace and prayed that their deaths will be ”AVENGED”. That’s a real damning word.

 

 

Here is the contrast I suppose. While Christianity– in the true sense, there are strange ”Christian” sects though who think Armageddon etc. are going to unfold out of the current situations in Middle East– is the religion of peace, forgiveness, letting go, loving and praying for your enemies; both Judaism and Islam seem heavily intent on revenge. Maybe this very basic instinct and culture of revenge is inflated, flamed and exploited to the best interests of corrupt and neurotic fundamentalists on both sides?

 

On Canada’s BBC and freedom of speech for Neo Nazis November 27, 2007

As a shameless act of self- promotion I felt tempted to post here two of my comments left on two different blogs. There are two reasons for this: first, I wanted to leave a bit of a lighter after some rather dense posts. Second, I wanted to express my opinion for record’s sake. So here they are:

 

 

 

 

1.) This was from some Blog about human rights violations in China that reproduced Canadian newspaper National Post’s news report, ‘‘Covering up slaughter, with a little help from the CBC”. This report mentions rather diabolical allegations that the Chinese government is involved in mass slaughter of Falun Gong members. Not only that, the Chinese authorities are disemboweling them to sell their organs on the market. I know it sounds like a very morbid conspiracy theory, but actually it has been verified by very credible sources like veteran former Canadian member of Parliament Mr. David Kilgour on his website. But of course the initial topic was that Canada’s public broadcaster CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) cowered under Chinese government pressure when it decided not to broadcast a documentary (or the vital parts of it) that investigated the serious allegations. I was tempted to make this short comment:


”If China can kick out BBC, Shut up Rupert Murdoch, Yahoo, Google…. then…. who the hell is CBC?”



2.) Now we come to the other blog whose writer and readers passionately and ”vehemently” supported Holocaust deniers’ freedom of speech. The two of them being, David Irwing and Nick Griffin. This issue has been on my mind for quite some time but was buried under others priorities and concerns. I was fortunate to have come across this post. This gave me an opportunity to suggest a solution to this debate and also express my opinion and sentiments. So here is my humble comment:


 

”Maybe we should send these folks to Iran on a tax payer funded public holiday or call it Sabbatical (nothing to do with Sabbath Day).

 

 

 

I am sure Mr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would greatly respect their freedom of expression. They can get it out of their system to their heart’s content, maybe go on prime time Al Jazeera and come back safely. What you think?”

 

To this the blogger replies:

 

 

 

Or maybe having giving a platform to fascist, they should have invited a genuine antifascist, like Ahmadinejad to speak at the Oxford Union. He’d get a more intelligent and polite reception than he did at CUNY”.



To which I yet again humbly reply:


I don’t think Ahmadinejad would be all that welcome. He would be hooted down and booted out the moment he opens his mouth about Homosexuality.”